A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the release of Big Rock’s Erratic Stone-Fired Ale. I promised at the time to post my impressions once I tried it. Well, I finally opened the bottle a few days back. It was bottle #1684 and, to be clear, I have every intention of keeping this attractive, Italian-made flip-top for my home-brewery (which will likely amuse Big Rock’s brewers, but not their accountants, as the bottles, I’m told, were expensive).
It offers an attractive dark red beer with brown hints, building an off white head with medium density and decent staying power. The aroma has moderate caramel, but that is quickly overtaken by an earthy and, frankly, mineral-y character. There is a sharp edge to the aroma. It is not unlike a red ale with a bit of smoke in it, even though the smoke does not come through directly.
Upfront I find a soft caramel, some light-bodied sugar and a cola-like prickliness. It seems a bit thin at first. In the middle, the beer starts to transform, building both malt and other characteristics. Some toffee and brown sugar appear, as does a bit of smoke, a hint of sharp loam and a rougher earthy feature. I also pick up some wood-fired caramel as the beer sits on my tongue. The linger offers burnt caramel, mild wood smoke with a dry character and a fascinating husky rebound.
This beer is all about the finish. It gets way more interesting at the end. A wood-fired caramel comes out, topped by some toffee and brown sugar, as does a bit of smoke, a hint of sharp loam and a rougher earthy edge. It don’t want to overplay the smoke – it is moderate and subtle, playing in the background but still present. The burnt caramel gives it a Scottish feel, while the hints of smoke make it seem more like a Rauchbier (but not quite). The start is disappointing, but the beer finds a way to deliver in the finish. I also wonder if, overall, the beer is almost too clean for the style.
I honestly can’t tell you how it compares to other Steinbier, as I have never had one. But, other than the thin opening, I suspect this is in the zone. An earthy, mineral-y character with a bit of smoke but not too much. The caramel should be accented and fairly deep.
I will be able to hear those who think the beer misses the mark. But I actually think they do a pretty good job with this beer. Just think about it. They threw a few rocks into the beer during the boil. There is not any science or a consultant to help them with that. They were on their own and found a way to make a legitimately “out-there” beer. Reviews may differ but, I believe, they created an interesting, admirable beer.
May 6, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Jason, watch out when you re-close and reopen the bottle: the metal band that wraps around the neck to hold the flip top in place slides out!
May 7, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Good to know. I will pay attention to that next bottling session.
May 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM
Tico, thanks for the heads up on the Erratic’s banded flip top, will make sure not to treat it like an anchored flip top
May 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM
The bottle in the picture looks like it has a crown cap AND a flip-top. Why is that?
May 7, 2013 at 4:21 PM
Nicolas, yes that is a crown cap. I suspect it is related to rules that require alcohol to be sold in tamper-proof containers (more accurately, in containers where one can observe if they have been opened). Capping a swing top is common (Howe Sound does this as well). Wild Rose, for example, puts a paper seal across the swing top which breaks if opened. There are loopholes (and many examples where clearly it is not tamper proof), but most breweries find a way to comply – I suspect this was BR’s solution. It does kind of wreck the image, doesn’t it?
May 7, 2013 at 4:36 PM
Yes it does. But I’m more concerned about actually using the flip-top for recapping a half finished beer. That flip-top is most likely dirty or contaminated. If they wanted something more ‘elegant’ than a crown cap, I would have gone with champagne style cork and wire.
May 7, 2013 at 3:42 PM
There is a great video of the process on the Big Rock site: http://www.bigrockbeer.com/beer/erratic-stone-fired-ale
May 8, 2013 at 10:41 AM
Jason thanks for the great review of our beer and I agree, the Erratic does have a nice finish. I noticed you referred to us throwing a few rocks into the boil. I just wanted to tell you it wasn’t quite as simple as that. We actually kicked it into a boil and maintained the boil for 75 minutes by rotating a new dosing of 700 degree rocks back into the wort every 15 minutes. Totally exciting for me and the most fun I’ve had in a long time…Cheers.
May 9, 2013 at 8:58 AM
Paul (and Brady), I did not intend to lead people to think that you just tossed some rocks in. I know you put a great deal of thought and calculation into it. I guess my point is that none of us really knew how it would turn out in the end. Next time I will try to turn down the “pithy” quotient 🙂
May 8, 2013 at 10:48 PM
While Paul the brewer beat me to it, I wholeheartedly agree that it was still rather pithy and ill-informed of you to refer to the brewing process as merely having “having thrown a few rocks in”. Blah.